Egypt’s Vision 2030 and Higher Education: Equity, Quality, and Governance from a Public Good Perspective
Published 2026-09-04
Keywords
- Egypt Vision 2030,
- Higher Education Policy,
- Public Good,
- Equity,
- Quality
- Governance ...More
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 Selim Abdellatif

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Abstract
Higher education has increasingly been positioned as a central instrument for national development, social mobility, and knowledge-based economic transformation. Across different world regions, governments have articulated comprehensive development strategies that assign universities a key role in advancing innovation, improving human capital, and addressing social inequalities. At the same time, these strategies often reflect tensions between viewing higher education as a public good that serves collective societal interests and treating it as a private investment oriented toward labour market outcomes and economic competitiveness.
Egypt’s Vision 2030 strategy identifies higher education as a key instrument for national development, with stated priorities related to access, quality, and governance. While the strategy has attracted growing scholarly and policy attention, its higher education agenda has received less attention through a public good framework that brings equity, quality, and governance together. This paper analyzes Egypt’s Vision 2030 higher education strategy through the lenses of equity, quality, and governance, drawing on a public good perspective. The study examines how the objectives of Vision 2030 are framed and operationalized and how these choices shape the reform agenda using a qualitative approach based on policy analysis and secondary literature.
The analysis argues that while Vision 2030 frames higher education through public good-oriented commitments to inclusion, quality, and social development, its operational tools emphasize access expansion, accreditation, benchmarking, and centralized performance steering. This creates tensions between the strategy’s broad public good aspirations and the instruments used to pursue higher education reform.
